Skip to content

UK Mailman's £330K Slot Jackpot Vanishes After 'Technical Error' by William Hill

One spin changed his life—until a corporate glitch erased it. Now, Stephen Harvey is trapped in a legal battle for the fortune he almost had.

The image shows a man playing a slot machine with the words "Jackpot" on it. He is surrounded by a...
The image shows a man playing a slot machine with the words "Jackpot" on it. He is surrounded by a board with text and pictures of fruits, suggesting that he is playing online casino games.

UK Mailman's £330K Slot Jackpot Vanishes After 'Technical Error' by William Hill

A UK mailman who won over £330,000 playing online slots has been left in limbo after the betting company cancelled his payout. Stephen Harvey hit the jackpot on William Hill's Jackpot Drop game on March 16, only to be told two days later that a technical error had voided his win. The company has since frozen his account, leaving him unable to access the funds. Harvey's big win came during a single gaming session on March 16, where he landed three separate jackpot bonuses. The total prize of £330,906 ($436,444) was credited to his account, and he immediately planned to use the money to buy a home, having lived in rented accommodation.

Two days after his win, Harvey received an email from William Hill. The message stated that a system glitch had incorrectly added funds to player accounts, giving the company the right to reverse the transaction. When he tried to withdraw the winnings, the request was denied, and his account was suspended.

William Hill's parent company, Evoke, confirmed the issue stemmed from a technical fault. The error caused incorrect balances to appear temporarily in some players' accounts. Harvey, now facing financial uncertainty, is considering legal action to recover the money. The stress of the situation has taken a toll, as he grapples with the loss of what he believed was a life-changing sum. Harvey remains locked out of his account, with no access to the disputed winnings. The company's decision leaves him without the funds he had earmarked for a house deposit. As of now, no statement has been issued by the British Gambling Commission regarding the case.

Read also: