Pennsylvania's barroom gambling plan flops with near-zero participation
Pennsylvania's plan to boost state revenue through barroom gambling has seen almost no uptake. Despite expectations of tens of millions in extra funds, only six of around 16,000 eligible bars and taverns have applied for the necessary licences. The low numbers have sparked debate over the system's accessibility and efficiency.
The state introduced the scheme to help balance its budget by expanding gambling into bars and taverns. Under the law, venues could offer raffles, drawings, and other small games—but participation has been minimal.
Industry representatives blame the complex process for the poor response. Applicants face a four-part procedure costing $2,000, along with lengthy background checks. The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board defends these steps as essential for licensing. State Senator Jake Corman drew parallels with the early struggles of the Affordable Care Act, suggesting the system may be too cumbersome. Meanwhile, the taverns industry argues that high costs and bureaucracy are deterring small businesses. No official figures exist yet on how many venues have actually received licences and begun offering games. Pennsylvania's gambling sector has thrived since 2006, though revenues dipped slightly in 2013 due to competition from neighbouring states. The new barroom gambling rules involve multiple agencies, including the Liquor Control Board and Department of Revenue, adding further layers to the process.
The programme's slow start leaves Pennsylvania far short of its financial goals. With only a handful of applications submitted, the state must now decide whether to adjust the process or accept limited returns. The outcome will determine whether barroom gambling becomes a reliable revenue stream or remains a largely unused option.
