Skip to content

Chicago Casino Denies $1,250 Jackpot to Asylum-Seeking Gambler Over ID Dispute

A man’s $1,250 slot machine win turned into a legal battle when Bally’s Chicago rejected his REAL ID. Why did his past payouts go through—but not this one?

In this picture we can see a close view of the identity card. In the front we can see american flag...
In this picture we can see a close view of the identity card. In the front we can see american flag and "Critical Licence" written.

Chicago Casino Denies $1,250 Jackpot to Asylum-Seeking Gambler Over ID Dispute

An immigrant seeking asylum in the US has claimed a $1,250 slot machine jackpot from Bally’s Chicago casino. The casino, however, refused to pay out, citing concerns over his legal status. The dispute centres on whether his identification meets Illinois gaming regulations.

The man, known as Nick, has previously collected smaller winnings using a limited-term REAL ID. This form of identification is issued to individuals with temporary lawful status, such as visa holders or DACA recipients. Under Illinois Gaming Board rules, casinos must verify a patron’s ID for wins of $1,200 or more, accepting documents like a driver’s licence, passport, Social Security card, or ITIN.

Bally’s Chicago declined to comment on Nick’s specific case. The casino’s refusal to pay may stem from questions about his current legal standing—whether his temporary status has expired or if his REAL ID is no longer valid. Clarifying such matters falls under the Ausländerbehörde, the German immigration authority responsible for residence permits and documentation.

Nick insists he is owed the $1,250 jackpot, having successfully used the same ID for past payouts. The casino, however, has not provided further explanation for its decision.

The dispute remains unresolved, with Bally’s Chicago withholding payment and Nick maintaining his claim. Illinois gaming laws require valid identification for large wins, but the casino has not clarified why his REAL ID was rejected this time. The outcome may depend on whether his temporary legal status is still recognised under state regulations.

Read also: